Paradoxes of Difference
نویسنده
چکیده
1263 C an " race " be gleaned from our genes? Concern over the emerging trajectories of genetics research has led to ongoing debates about how to characterize and interpret genetic variation. Despite the mantra that humans share 99.9% of our genetic makeup, there is increasing interest in identifying the relatively small percentage difference that distinguishes individuals. Therein lies the paradox: if we are all the same, why do we continue to search for the ways in which we differ from one another? We can take an essential fi rst step toward addressing this paradox by acknowledging the often confl icting stakes for individuals and groups in debates that center around genes, science, and race. Whose genes will be studied? For what purpose? And who has the authority to decide? These stakes are laid bare by Cassandra Medley in her play " Relativity, " which ran at the Magic Theater in San Francisco this spring, in a production directed by Edris Cooper-Anifowoshe. The play focuses on the inner confl ict of a young scientist, an African American woman who tries unsuccessfully to straddle the opposing world views of her profession and her family. In " Relativity, " Kalima Davis is a postdoctoral fellow in a prestigious stem cell laboratory on the East Coast. Her impeccable academic pedigree distinguishes Kalima as a rising researcher, and she is one of the few women and African American scientists working in the fi eld. Kalima is also the devoted daughter of the charismatic psychotherapist Claire Reid, who directs the " Leon Davis Foundation, " which Kalima's late father dedicated to the belief that neuropeptide melanin, found in " people of color, " enhances intelligence, athleticism, and emotional sensitivity. This theory also points to the lack of melanin among lighter skinned individuals as a cause of " white racism. " Kalima, who has inherited co-directorship of her father's foundation, is asked by her mother to offer " scientifi c proof " of the melanin theories and to discount the assertion that all groups are genetically similar. At issue in " Relativity " is the struggle over what constitutes a valid belief. Reid suggests to Kalima that " science is not the sole province of what the 'West' defi nes it to be, " and refers to Chinese acupuncture, Hindu Chakra, and tribal African shamanism as examples of legitimate " sciences. " But the power of …
منابع مشابه
Paradox in the Poetry of Hazin-e Lahiji
Paradox is one of the literary techniques in the poetry of the Safavid poets. Hazin-e Lahiji, like so many other poets of that age, employed this technique in his pursuit and showed that "unfamiliar meaning". Paradox is used in the poetry of Hazin-e Lahiji for the purpose of defamiliarization and exoticism. The poet in order to create new implications and subtle and insightful points and also t...
متن کاملWhy Defeasible Deontic Logic needs a Multi Preference Semantics
There is a fundamental difference between a conditional obligation being violated by a fact, and a conditional obligation being overridden by another conditional obligation. In this paper we analyze this difference in the multi preference semantics of our defeasible deontic logic DEFDIODE. The semantics contains one preference relation for ideality, which can be used to formalize deontic parado...
متن کاملMultipartite Greenberger-horne-zeilinger Paradoxes for Continuous Variables
We show how to construct Greenberger-Horn-Zeilinger type paradoxes for continuous variable systems. We give two examples corresponding to 3 party and 5 party paradoxes. The paradoxes are revealed by carrying out position and momentum measurements. The structure of the quantum states which lead to these paradoxes is discussed.
متن کاملParadoxes of Intensionality
We identify a class of paradoxes that are neither set-theoretical or semantical, but that seem to depend on intensionality. In particular, these paradoxes arise out of plausible properties of propositional attitudes and their objects. We try to explain why logicians have neglected these paradoxes, and to show that, like the Russell Paradox and the direct discourse Liar Paradox, these intensiona...
متن کاملIntensionality and Paradoxes in Ramsey's 'the Foundations of Mathematics'
In ‘The Foundations of Mathematics’, Frank Ramsey separates paradoxes into two groups, now taken to be the logical and the semantical. But he also revises the logical system developed in Whitehead and Russell’s Principia Mathematica, and in particular attempts to provide an alternate resolution of the semantical paradoxes. I reconstruct the logic that he develops for this purpose, and argue tha...
متن کاملDoxastic Paradoxes without Self-Reference
Certain doxastic paradoxes (paradoxes analogous to the Paradox of the Liar but involving ideal belief instead of truth) demonstrate that some formal paradoxes cannot be avoided simply by limiting the expressiveness of one's formal language in order to exclude the very possibility of self-referential thoughts and beliefs. These non-selfreferential paradoxes, moreover, should be of special intere...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- PLoS Biology
دوره 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004